peer reviewers’ comments on research articles submitted by iranian researchers

Authors

mohammad hassan tharirian

elham sadri

abstract

the invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international english-medium journals. this study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectations and requirements. such awareness may be fostered by addressing the characteristics of review genre and the most frequent comments made by the reviewers. to address such typical features, a corpus of reviewers’ reports on 32 manuscripts submitted by iranian researchers in three fields of engineering, medicine, and social sciences was analyzed. the results of the analysis revealed that review reports followed a certain format and structure and most of the comments made by reviewers were on the content-based defects such as procedural infelicities, poor study design or ignoring the literature. language-use comments, including lexico-grammatical problems, lack of clarity, spelling mistakes, and verbosity, ranked second in terms of frequency but since content failure often overlaps language-related issues they appeared to be as important. these findings may be of help for graduate students and novice authors who need to develop and improve skills for academic writing as well as eap practitioners who devote effort to furnish materials to aid researchers in writing publications in english. keywords: peer review process, reviewers’ reports, comment, content comment, language-use comment

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers

The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...

full text

Responding to reviewers' comments on submitted articles.

The letter from the editor generally comes in one of 4 flavors. First, a manuscript may be accepted without any changes. If this happens to you, count yourself lucky; such an editorial response is rare. In our experience, this has happened only once for each of us. Second, the manuscript may be accepted with suggestions for minor revisions. Again, count your blessings, quickly make the suggeste...

full text

the impact of peer review on efl reviewers writing proficiency

امروزه تصحیح همکلاسی در کلاسهای نگارش یکی از اجزاء لاینفک کلاسهای دانش آموز محور است. تاثیرات مفید تصحیح همکلاسی بر زبان آموزان، معلمان را متقاعد کرده است که علیرغم صرف زمان، انرژی و توان بسیار، از این شیوه ی آموزشی در کلاسهای آموزش نگارش بهره بگیرند. تحقیق حاضر بر آن است تا با مقایسه دو گروه از یادگیرندگان زبان انگلیسی، تاثیر تصحیح همکلاسی را بر توانایی نوشتاری آنها نشان دهد. 122 خانم زبان آمو...

15 صفحه اول

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
journal of teaching language skills

Publisher: shiraz university

ISSN 2008-8189

volume 5

issue 3 2013

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023